Rethinking “Independent Lots” in Poultry Processing: What the Data Is Telling Us

A one-size-fits-all lot definition is no longer sufficient...

Author: Denise Heard Apr 29, 2026

Defining an “independent lot” in secondary poultry processing remains a critical and unresolved challenge. While facilities commonly rely on combos (1,800–2,000 lb batches) as practical production units, emerging data shows they do not consistently behave as independent units from a microbial risk standpoint.


Lot definition matters because it directly affects process control, response to contamination, and product disposition. If defined too broadly, risk may be underestimated; too narrowly, it can drive unnecessary cost and waste. A balanced, science-based approach is essential.


To address this, the U.S. Poultry & Egg Association funded—and accelerated—a multi-plant research initiative to evaluate how contamination behaves under real-world conditions. The study examined microbial variability, tested common lot definitions (combo, shift, source) and established baseline data for benchmarking.


Key Findings:
• High variability: Salmonella presence (~21%) was uneven, with clear “hot spots” across products and time 
• Inconsistent independence: Combos sometimes behaved independently, but not reliably across all facilities 
• Intervention gaps: Many antimicrobial interventions underperformed in real-world conditions 
• Value of benchmarking: Plant- and shift-level baselines improved visibility and decision-making 


What This Means:
A one-size-fits-all lot definition is no longer sufficient. Instead, facilities should adopt data-driven, plant-specific approaches that reflect actual contamination patterns. The findings also highlight opportunities to optimize interventions and better target control strategies, particularly as contamination may increase over a production shift.


The Bottom Line:
“Independent lot” is not a fixed concept; it depends on process conditions and variability. Using data to define and manage lots more precisely can improve food safety outcomes while reducing unnecessary cost and product loss.


Denise Heard

About Denise Heard

Dr. Denise Heard received her Bachelor of Science in Agriculture and Poultry Science, Doctorate of Veterinary Medicine and a Master of Avian Medicine, all from the University of Georgia. She is a board-certified poultry veterinarian through the American College of Poultry Veterinarians and an active participant and leader in several professional poultry organizations. Dr. Heard served as the senior coordinator for the United States Department of Agriculture National Poultry Improvement Plan for ten years before beginning her current role as the Vice President of Research for USPOULTRY.

All author posts

Related Posts

American Prosperity Above Regulation
Dec 1, 2025 - 10 min read

American Prosperity Above Regulation

It is the Executive Branch’s policy “to be prudent and financially responsible in the expenditure of funds, from both public and private sources, and to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens...